Why businesses should strive for Digital Evolution, not Digital Transformation
The loudest voices in digital transformation programmes are usually the ones with the most to sell. Most businesses don't need to knock everything down, they need to understand what's working, map the motivations of everyone in the room, and sequence the change properly
<p>The loudest voices in any digital transformation programme are usually the ones with the most to sell.</p>
<p>Software vendors with six figure licence fees to justify. Implementation agencies with 18 month roadmaps to fill. Consultants presenting slide decks that make your current setup look like it belongs in a museum. The message, dressed up in various ways, is always broadly the same: everything you have is broken, everything needs to change, and the only path forward is through them.</p>
<p>It is rarely true.</p>
<p>And the businesses that believe it tend to pay for that belief twice — once in the initial outlay, and again in the disruption, the delay, and the quiet but lasting damage done to the people who have to live through the change.</p>
<h2>Start with what you have</h2>
<p>Twenty years working with manufacturers, retailers and DTC brands has taught me to start every engagement with the same two questions: what are we trying to achieve — and what's actually working here?</p>
<p>Not what could be better. Not what the market leader is doing. What is working, right now, in this business that we can retain, build on, or modify enough to generate the next layer of growth.</p>
<p>Because here's the thing nobody says at the start of a transformation programme: you almost never need to knock everything down. The only people who usually say you do are the ones selling the demolition.</p>
<p>There's a meaningful distinction hiding inside some overused language. Digital Transformation implies a radical overhaul — a restart, a clean slate, a before and after.</p>
<p>Digital Evolution means something different. It means auditing what exists, identifying what works, and building incrementally from there. Generating revenue that funds the next improvement. Ramp up rather than rip out.</p>
<p>Good digital commerce programmes should be largely self-funding. Not in year three, not after a painful stabilisation period, but from relatively early in the process. That only happens when you sequence investment sensibly — new capability where it is genuinely needed, existing capability retained and optimised where it is not.</p>
<p>The pressure that comes from a huge upfront investment is one of the most underestimated risks in any programme. When the board has committed significant capital before a single customer has transacted, the expectations baked in from day one are often impossible to meet. The programme starts on the backfoot before it is ready to walk.</p>
<h2>The technology mistake almost everyone makes</h2>
<p>When a business comes to us saying they need to upgrade their tech, the most common mistake has already happened before we have walked through the door. They have not looked at what they actually have — or worse, are not equipped with the knowledge to understand its full potential.</p>
<p>A shiny new ecommerce platform sitting on top of a groaning, temperamental PIM that nobody wants to replace will create more problems than it solves. A 20-person business that has been convinced to sign a five year enterprise licence for software that could have been a monthly rolling SaaS subscription at a tenth of the price has not upgraded — it has just taken on a different kind of burden. And cost.</p>
<p>I have seen companies buy sledgehammers to crack walnuts more times than I can count. The software industry relies on it.</p>
<p>What nobody wants to invest in — but is absolutely essential before any significant system RFP — is a proper tech stack audit, people capability mapping, and an honest review of how the existing ecosystem is actually being used. Because a bad driver will make the best car seem slow. The problem is not always the tools. It is often the relationship between the tools and the people using them.</p>
<p>Before committing to any <a href="/insights/should-you-replatform-your-ecommerce-site">platform migration or replatforming project</a>, the first investment should be understanding what the current platform is actually capable of — and whether the problem is genuinely architectural or whether it is a people and governance failure that will follow you to the new platform regardless.</p>
<h2>The skills question nobody wants to answer honestly</h2>
<p>Walk into enough businesses and you will recognise a familiar figure. The Head of IT who was hired 22 years ago as a customer service intern, helped fix the printers, did an evening course, and has been patching things together ever since. Capable, loyal, irreplaceable in terms of institutional knowledge. But not equipped — through no fault of their own — with the capability and framework needed to optimise the current setup, prepare for growth, or manage the tools, processes, partnerships and people that the next chapter will require.</p>
<p>This is not a criticism of that person. It is a structural problem. <a href="/insights/ecommerce-capability-gap-uk-manufacturers">The business grew around them without ever building the capability infrastructure to match.</a></p>
<p>New skills are needed. But so is the wisdom to retain what cannot be taught — the contextual knowledge that only comes from having been inside a business for decades. Evolution means holding both of those things at once.</p>
<p>It is why my experience ultimately led me to build Right Partners around a core belief: that strategy, technology and people are inseparable. You cannot fix one without considering the other two. Businesses that treat them as separate workstreams are almost always the ones who end up buying the sledgehammer. And usually buying another one five years later.</p>
<h2>Map the motivations before you design the change</h2>
<p>Let me give you a concrete example of what Digital Evolution looks like in practice.</p>
<p>A traditional bathroom manufacturer — heritage brand, strong B2B retailer channel, sold almost exclusively offline through a network of established trade partners. The internal debate about <a href="/insights/how-aqualisa-built-a-dtc-ecommerce-channel-without-losing-its-trade-business">going DTC</a> had been running for years. The sales team's position was firm: do it and you will destroy your retailer relationships.</p>
<p>What went unsaid — but matters enormously — is that the sales team in this business were commission-driven on sales into the retailer channel. Their concern was real, but their incentive to overstate it was equally real.</p>
<p>This is one of the most consistently overlooked dynamics in any transformation programme. Every person in the room has a motivation, a fear, something to protect or something to gain. The board sees strategy. The sales team sees their commission. The IT team sees their workload. The retailers see their margin.</p>
<p>None of these perspectives are wrong. But if you do not map them explicitly — if you do not understand what each party stands to lose and gain before you design the approach — you will find yourself managing resistance you could have converted into collaboration.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>People do not resist change because they are obstructive. They resist because nobody showed them where they fit in the new world.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Once you understand everyone's motivations, you can align them. Overlook them and you will spend your implementation budget managing a political problem that should have been a process design consideration from the start.</p>
<p>So instead of forcing the change, we worked with the existing dynamic. A click and collect scheme where DTC orders could be fulfilled through retailer locations, with a revenue share attributed to whichever retailer managed the handover. The manufacturer got their DTC capability. The retailer got paid for receiving and handing over an order. The end customer got their product. And the internal sales team grew their commissions and retained their loyal trade customers.</p>
<p>This is what we call a Trifactor outcome — where the business, its channel partners and the end customer all win simultaneously. It is not always easy to design. But it is always worth the effort. The resistance dissolved because the opportunity was real and visible to everyone in the room.</p>
<p>Then we went further. We turned those retailer locations into rich listing pages on the manufacturer's website — media, services, reviews — and put PPC and social spend behind them. The manufacturer was not just selling through the channel. They were investing in it.</p>
<h2>Sequence the messaging. Or pay the price.</h2>
<p>The most avoidable mistake in any transformation programme is not technical. It is communicating too little, too late — or too much, too soon.</p>
<p>Fear of a thing is usually worse than the thing itself. Tell internal stakeholders or trade channel customers that something is changing before you have built the clarity, the approach and the articulated benefits — and you will spend the rest of the programme managing anxiety you created yourself.</p>
<p>Build well. Build quickly. Build quietly. Then launch with a communications plan that lands the benefits for every stakeholder simultaneously, so nobody hears about it secondhand.</p>
<p>The alternative is self-destructive. I have seen manufacturers launch DTC sites without telling their trade channel customers. The result: 40% of hard won trade loyalty gone overnight, in exchange for 5% DTC new growth. Not because DTC was wrong. Because the sequencing was.</p>
<h2>Strategy, technology and people are not separate workstreams</h2>
<p>They are one conversation. The businesses that understand that — who audit before they overhaul, who sequence before they scale, who bring people with them rather than dragging them behind — are the ones that come out the other side with something that actually works.</p>
<p>You do not knock down an entire house just because you want to upgrade the wifi.</p>
<p>If your business is navigating a digital transformation conversation right now — whether it is a <a href="/insights/should-you-replatform-your-ecommerce-site">platform decision</a>, a <a href="/insights/ecommerce-capability-gap-uk-manufacturers">people and capability question</a>, or the DTC channel conflict problem — <a href="/free-strategy-consultation">book a free 60-minute conversation with Right Partners</a>. No pitch. No slides. An honest view of what evolution looks like for your specific situation.</p>
Thomas Dee is founder of Right Partners, a strategic ecommerce agency helping UK manufacturers and retailers with ecommerce consultancy, platform strategy and end-to-end delivery. With 20 years of commercial experience, Thomas has led ecommerce programmes across manufacturing and retail — including three years as Head of Strategy at Tom&Co, one of the UK's leading Adobe Commerce and Magento agencies.
Follow on LinkedIn →More articles coming soon.
Why businesses should strive for Digital Evolution, not Digital Transformation
The loudest voices in digital transformation programmes are usually the ones with the most to sell. Most businesses don't need to knock everything down, they need to understand what's working, map the motivations of everyone in the room, and sequence the change properly
The loudest voices in any digital transformation programme are usually the ones with the most to sell.
Software vendors with six figure licence fees to justify. Implementation agencies with 18 month roadmaps to fill. Consultants presenting slide decks that make your current setup look like it belongs in a museum. The message, dressed up in various ways, is always broadly the same: everything you have is broken, everything needs to change, and the only path forward is through them.
It is rarely true.
And the businesses that believe it tend to pay for that belief twice — once in the initial outlay, and again in the disruption, the delay, and the quiet but lasting damage done to the people who have to live through the change.
Start with what you have
Twenty years working with manufacturers, retailers and DTC brands has taught me to start every engagement with the same two questions: what are we trying to achieve — and what's actually working here?
Not what could be better. Not what the market leader is doing. What is working, right now, in this business that we can retain, build on, or modify enough to generate the next layer of growth.
Because here's the thing nobody says at the start of a transformation programme: you almost never need to knock everything down. The only people who usually say you do are the ones selling the demolition.
There's a meaningful distinction hiding inside some overused language. Digital Transformation implies a radical overhaul — a restart, a clean slate, a before and after.
Digital Evolution means something different. It means auditing what exists, identifying what works, and building incrementally from there. Generating revenue that funds the next improvement. Ramp up rather than rip out.
Good digital commerce programmes should be largely self-funding. Not in year three, not after a painful stabilisation period, but from relatively early in the process. That only happens when you sequence investment sensibly — new capability where it is genuinely needed, existing capability retained and optimised where it is not.
The pressure that comes from a huge upfront investment is one of the most underestimated risks in any programme. When the board has committed significant capital before a single customer has transacted, the expectations baked in from day one are often impossible to meet. The programme starts on the backfoot before it is ready to walk.
The technology mistake almost everyone makes
When a business comes to us saying they need to upgrade their tech, the most common mistake has already happened before we have walked through the door. They have not looked at what they actually have — or worse, are not equipped with the knowledge to understand its full potential.
A shiny new ecommerce platform sitting on top of a groaning, temperamental PIM that nobody wants to replace will create more problems than it solves. A 20-person business that has been convinced to sign a five year enterprise licence for software that could have been a monthly rolling SaaS subscription at a tenth of the price has not upgraded — it has just taken on a different kind of burden. And cost.
I have seen companies buy sledgehammers to crack walnuts more times than I can count. The software industry relies on it.
What nobody wants to invest in — but is absolutely essential before any significant system RFP — is a proper tech stack audit, people capability mapping, and an honest review of how the existing ecosystem is actually being used. Because a bad driver will make the best car seem slow. The problem is not always the tools. It is often the relationship between the tools and the people using them.
Before committing to any platform migration or replatforming project, the first investment should be understanding what the current platform is actually capable of — and whether the problem is genuinely architectural or whether it is a people and governance failure that will follow you to the new platform regardless.
The skills question nobody wants to answer honestly
Walk into enough businesses and you will recognise a familiar figure. The Head of IT who was hired 22 years ago as a customer service intern, helped fix the printers, did an evening course, and has been patching things together ever since. Capable, loyal, irreplaceable in terms of institutional knowledge. But not equipped — through no fault of their own — with the capability and framework needed to optimise the current setup, prepare for growth, or manage the tools, processes, partnerships and people that the next chapter will require.
This is not a criticism of that person. It is a structural problem. The business grew around them without ever building the capability infrastructure to match.
New skills are needed. But so is the wisdom to retain what cannot be taught — the contextual knowledge that only comes from having been inside a business for decades. Evolution means holding both of those things at once.
It is why my experience ultimately led me to build Right Partners around a core belief: that strategy, technology and people are inseparable. You cannot fix one without considering the other two. Businesses that treat them as separate workstreams are almost always the ones who end up buying the sledgehammer. And usually buying another one five years later.
Map the motivations before you design the change
Let me give you a concrete example of what Digital Evolution looks like in practice.
A traditional bathroom manufacturer — heritage brand, strong B2B retailer channel, sold almost exclusively offline through a network of established trade partners. The internal debate about going DTC had been running for years. The sales team's position was firm: do it and you will destroy your retailer relationships.
What went unsaid — but matters enormously — is that the sales team in this business were commission-driven on sales into the retailer channel. Their concern was real, but their incentive to overstate it was equally real.
This is one of the most consistently overlooked dynamics in any transformation programme. Every person in the room has a motivation, a fear, something to protect or something to gain. The board sees strategy. The sales team sees their commission. The IT team sees their workload. The retailers see their margin.
None of these perspectives are wrong. But if you do not map them explicitly — if you do not understand what each party stands to lose and gain before you design the approach — you will find yourself managing resistance you could have converted into collaboration.
People do not resist change because they are obstructive. They resist because nobody showed them where they fit in the new world.
Once you understand everyone's motivations, you can align them. Overlook them and you will spend your implementation budget managing a political problem that should have been a process design consideration from the start.
So instead of forcing the change, we worked with the existing dynamic. A click and collect scheme where DTC orders could be fulfilled through retailer locations, with a revenue share attributed to whichever retailer managed the handover. The manufacturer got their DTC capability. The retailer got paid for receiving and handing over an order. The end customer got their product. And the internal sales team grew their commissions and retained their loyal trade customers.
This is what we call a Trifactor outcome — where the business, its channel partners and the end customer all win simultaneously. It is not always easy to design. But it is always worth the effort. The resistance dissolved because the opportunity was real and visible to everyone in the room.
Then we went further. We turned those retailer locations into rich listing pages on the manufacturer's website — media, services, reviews — and put PPC and social spend behind them. The manufacturer was not just selling through the channel. They were investing in it.
Sequence the messaging. Or pay the price.
The most avoidable mistake in any transformation programme is not technical. It is communicating too little, too late — or too much, too soon.
Fear of a thing is usually worse than the thing itself. Tell internal stakeholders or trade channel customers that something is changing before you have built the clarity, the approach and the articulated benefits — and you will spend the rest of the programme managing anxiety you created yourself.
Build well. Build quickly. Build quietly. Then launch with a communications plan that lands the benefits for every stakeholder simultaneously, so nobody hears about it secondhand.
The alternative is self-destructive. I have seen manufacturers launch DTC sites without telling their trade channel customers. The result: 40% of hard won trade loyalty gone overnight, in exchange for 5% DTC new growth. Not because DTC was wrong. Because the sequencing was.
Strategy, technology and people are not separate workstreams
They are one conversation. The businesses that understand that — who audit before they overhaul, who sequence before they scale, who bring people with them rather than dragging them behind — are the ones that come out the other side with something that actually works.
You do not knock down an entire house just because you want to upgrade the wifi.
If your business is navigating a digital transformation conversation right now — whether it is a platform decision, a people and capability question, or the DTC channel conflict problem — book a free 60-minute conversation with Right Partners. No pitch. No slides. An honest view of what evolution looks like for your specific situation.
Thomas Dee is founder of Right Partners, a strategic ecommerce agency helping UK manufacturers and retailers with ecommerce consultancy, platform strategy and end-to-end delivery. With 20 years of commercial experience, Thomas has led ecommerce programmes across manufacturing and retail - including three years as Head of Strategy at Tom&Co, one of the UK's leading Adobe Commerce and Magento agencies - before founding Right Partners to offer businesses a single accountable partner from strategy through to build and go-live.
Follow Thomas on LinkedIn →Stay ahead of
UK Ecommerce Insights.
The Right Report, monthly insights and independent perspective on ecommerce, platform strategy and digital transformation, direct to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Right Partners will never share your details.